[pp.int.general] Transparency in the party

[Anouk Neeteson]

Another example, in the name of transparancy, I release so much data that
few people could actually make a correct analysis to get a 'transparant'
picture/understanding.

So just data is not enough, my point is that just the word transparancy has
a virtual/ethical meaning without a practical context.

Have you ever seen a transparant government member? :p
On Mar 1, 2013 10:01 a.m., "Cal." <peppecal at gmail.com> wrote:

> 01/03/13 09.56, Anouk Neeteson:
> > Here starts the confusion over transparancy. Total transparancy in the
> > absolute (as stated) in any organisation is impossible without giving up
> > /all/ privacy of the involved individuals.
>
> Disagreed. You can have transparency, when ALL the information used by
> individuals to decide is available to you, to analyze what they did, and
> possibly what the rationale behind was.
>
> In a transparent world, you don't need to know if I have conflict of
> interests, because—given data—you can immediately see if I did something
> to unfairly advantage someone.
> ____________________________________________________
> Pirate Parties International - General Talk
> pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net
> http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.pirateweb.net/pipermail/pp.international.general/attachments/20130301/3b8612f0/attachment.html>