[pp.int.general] Statutes Amendments

[Zbigniew Łukasiak]

On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 7:57 PM, Davidd van Deijk
<davidd at piratenpartij.nl> wrote:
> Just looking at the statute amendment proposals as a non voting
> interested person:
>
> Sap-17 + sap-18 i dont know enough abuot different arbitration law
> systems to comment.

I'd like to see a lawyer comment on this - in particular about the
possible paradox of CoA deciding on the validity of GA (and in result
also on the validity of it's own election).  I guess there should be
some standard boilerplate law code for this.  Do we have a lawyer
on-board?

>
> I really like SAP-19/sap-20/sap-21 i think it will make a lot of stuff
> that is now bogging down debates trivial.
>
> I dont really understand sap22. what is the actual proposal?
>
> sap-23+motion not something i'd enforce by statutes
>
> sap 24 i like the idea, but i'd defer some of this to rules of procedure
> instead of in the statutes
>
> sap-25 less preferred for me than 19/20/21, because it depends on groups
> agreeing that currently cant seem to agree.
>
> sap-26 -> rules of procedure
>
> sap-27 -> having additional board members ready makes it easier for Coa
> to take action against boardmembers failing to do their job.

++

I wish the authors of sap-25 consulted with the authors of
sap-19/20/21 - two so similar motions only generate voting chaos (and
possible political plays - I hope that splitting votes etc. was not
the reason we have those two).

Cheers,
Zbigniew


>
> On 03/23/13 00:04, Gregory Engels wrote:
>> We also got some via email.
>>
>> we will transfer them into the wiki tomorrow.
>>
>>
>> sincerely yours,
>>
>> Gregory Engels
>> Co-Chairman
>> Pirate Parties International
>>
>> mobile: +49 172 853 44 91
>> skype:gregory.engels
>> jabber:dichter at jabber.piratenpartei.de
>> my free time: http://doodle.com/dichter
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 22.03.2013, at 11:23, Anouk Neeteson <jakobsheep at gmail.com
>> <mailto:jakobsheep at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>> Is updated, have a look again.
>>>
>>> On Mar 18, 2013 9:28 a.m., "Zbigniew Łukasiak" <zzbbyy at gmail.com
>>> <mailto:zzbbyy at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>>     Is anyone working on new amendments?  It would be good if the
>>>     proposals were submitted early and we could discuss them here.  Then
>>>     the authors would have a chance to improve them.
>>>
>>>     http://wiki.pp-international.net/PPI_Conference_2013/Statutes_Amendments
>>>
>>>     --
>>>     Zbigniew Lukasiak
>>>     http://brudnopis.blogspot.com/
>>>     http://perlalchemy.blogspot.com/
>>>     ____________________________________________________
>>>     Pirate Parties International - General Talk
>>>     pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net
>>>     <mailto:pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net>
>>>     http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general
>>>
>>> ____________________________________________________
>>> Pirate Parties International - General Talk
>>> pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net
>>> <mailto:pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net>
>>> http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general
>>
>>
>>
>> ____________________________________________________
>> Pirate Parties International - General Talk
>> pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net
>> http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general
>
> ____________________________________________________
> Pirate Parties International - General Talk
> pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net
> http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general



--
Zbigniew Lukasiak
http://brudnopis.blogspot.com/
http://perlalchemy.blogspot.com/