[pp.int.general] Antonio - do you want to work with us in organizing this movement?

[Antonio Garcia]

Jesus, can I talk to someone competent?

Do I really have to spell everything out not to waste six months explaining the obvious?

Can I take obvious things for obvious, or am I still talking in KinderGarten?

I meant the FIRST ruling of the CoA ABOUT Pirates de Catalunya full membership, which is the subject WE were talking about. Not the first ever ruling of that particular class of Court of Arbitration.

Thay one Court of Arbitration has proven to be absolutely incompetent, all the way, in even the most trivial of rulings.

By the way, the spokesperson for the actual one is not showing much aptitude either, reading his comments:

http://samedokan.wordpress.com/2014/05/10/when-pirates-do-prefer-censorship/

And I am still kept waiting. Luckily, I reduced possible damage to a minimum as only Julia Reda got a seat in the European Parliament... results could have been far better if I had worked towards good results rather than against because nobody left me better options.

I certainly needed to avoid a catalan pirate confederation member of European Parliament. I do not know how much of their failure was own merit and how much mine ;).

Now please, let somebody more prepared speak, or pay more attention to detail and do not blunder.

My patience with incompetence is becoming very, very thin.




> Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2014 17:05:22 +0200
> From: zzbbyy at gmail.com
> To: pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net
> Subject: Re: [pp.int.general] Antonio - do you want to work with us in organizing this movement?
> 
> On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 4:41 PM, Antonio Garcia <ningunotro at hotmail.com> wrote:
> > Show me where the rationality an due diligence of the process was NOT
> > ditched ;(.
> >
> > I have told you CLEARLY... where it was ditched. In the first stupid
> > sentence of the Court of Arbitration.
> 
> Right - the Court of Arbitration ruling was wrong.
> 
> But in fact the CoA could not rule that the very GA that elected them
> is invalid. The only ruling it could logically do is to rule that this
> is outside of its competence. And the current one also cannot nullify
> the chain of events that lead to its election - because it would also
> make itself invalid and thus also the very decision.
> 
> Is there any other way that would make you say - "OK - this was fair enough"?
> 
> Z.
> ____________________________________________________
> Pirate Parties International - General Talk
> pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net
> http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general
 		 	   		  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.pirateweb.net/pipermail/pp.international.general/attachments/20140605/dec7e1f2/attachment.html>