[pp.int.general] The conference - what went wrong; how can we do better?

[Nicolas Sahlqvist]

How do we finance it, any ideas?


- Nicolas


On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 7:07 PM, W Tovey <will.tovey at pp-international.net>wrote:

>  I'd suggest holding the next conference in the Americas. I know this will
> likely be opposed by many, but the next one will hopefully focus on tidying
> up the statutes and appointing new members - if properly organised, remote
> participation should be enough.
>
> -Will
>
>
> On 21/04/2010 17:58, Nicolas Sahlqvist wrote:
> > I tend to think that the form of PPI will not make it more or less
> > international, it is rather the way we push for PPI to become more
> > international and that is a challenge considering most PP's are located
> > within Europe. Any ideas how we make PP's more popular in Latin America,
> > Asia, Africa and Caribbean?
> >
> >
> > - Nicolas
> >   PPI
> >
> >
> > 2010/4/21 Błażej Kaczorowski <blazej.kaczorowski at gmail.com><blazej.kaczorowski at gmail.com>
> >
> >> If we want PPI really international now European we need to change it
> >> to federation - now it is organization.
> >>
> >> Blazej
> >> PP Poland
> >>
> >> On 21 April 2010 17:54, Justus Ršoemeth <squig at dfpx.de> <squig at dfpx.de>wrote:
> >>> I didn't say it was perfect in Brussels. I just tried to point out that
> >> by
> >>> pushing it towards the Americas you are pulling it away from Oceania.
> May
> >> be
> >>> easier to keep it at local working times and just expect the other
> people
> >> to
> >>> get up earlier or stay up longer. Trying to make it best for the
> Americas
> >>> and Europe is counterproductive in my opinion.
> >>>
> >>> On 21.04.10 17:31, Andrew Norton wrote:
> >>>>
>
> On 4/21/2010 11:08 AM, Justus R?oemeth wrote:
>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> But those times are really unfortunate for remote participation of
> >>>>> places like NZ and AUS.
> >>>>> I don't think we'll be able to find a solution here that works for
> >>>>> everyone perfectly.
> >>>>>
>
> The current times were pretty exclusionary as well. at GMT+10, you were
> looking at starting around 6pm(9am) and ending at what, 3am (7pm)? not
> THAT bad, but not that great either.
>
>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 21.04.10 14:57, Andrew Norton wrote:
> >>>>> On 4/21/2010 3:49 AM, Wolfgang Preiss wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> As it comes to the other points you mentioned, there is hardly I
> can
> >>>>>>>> say, I only can express an opinion there. As for time planning,
> the
> >>>>>>>> conference is being planned as it fits best local time. Although
> >> this
> >>>>>>>> means for the remote deligates to sit at 3am or earlier at the
> >>>>>>>> computer,
> >>>>>>>> it is much easier to handle for them to do so, than for the larger
> >>>>>>>> number of deligates at the conference to adapt to the time wishes
> of
> >>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>> remote deligates. After all these can benefit participating from
> >> their
> >>>>>>>> homes. After the majority of PPI members is located in europe that
> >> is
> >>>>>>>> a
> >>>>>>>> burden for the deligates in other time zones to carry. Sorry :-)
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I'm not talking about a major shift, like starting at 4pm and going
> >>>>> until 2am local, I'm talking about maybe starting at 12 noon,
> finishing
> >>>>> at 7/8. 3 hours can make a fair bit of difference. Then the social
> >> stuff
> >>>>> can be done in the AM (and still at night). now a meeting held in the
> >>>>> Americas would benefit from an early start, say 8-9am, so that its
> not
> >>>>> too late for European remotes.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Regards
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Wolfgang
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
>
> ____________________________________________________
> Pirate Parties International - General Talk
> pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net
> http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general
>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
>
>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ____________________________________________________
> >>>>> Pirate Parties International - General Talk
> >>>>> pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net
> >>>>> http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general
> >>>>>
>
>  ____________________________________________________
> Pirate Parties International - General Talk
> pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net
> http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> ____________________________________________________
> >>> Pirate Parties International - General Talk
> >>> pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net
> >>> http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general
> >>>
> >> ____________________________________________________
> >> Pirate Parties International - General Talk
> >> pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net
> >> http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general
> >>
>
> > ____________________________________________________
> > Pirate Parties International - General Talk
> > pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net
> > http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________
> Pirate Parties International - General Talk
> pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net
> http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.pirateweb.net/pipermail/pp.international.general/attachments/20100421/04d1e9ba/attachment-0001.htm>