[pp.int.general] Wikileaks under DDoS attack

Jay Emerson jemers2 at gmail.com
Mon Nov 29 08:56:36 CET 2010


Leak didn't happen in the U.S.
On Nov 29, 2010 12:46 AM, "Andrew Norton" <ktetch at gmail.com> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 11/28/2010 4:47 PM, Jay Emerson wrote:
>> Innocent until proven guilty in the U.S.
>
> *facepalm* Ladies and gentlemen, I give you... US educational standards!
>
> ACTIONS are legal, or illegal. That's what laws are, a list of actions
> and the situations in which they are "illegal" An illegal act, is ALWAYS
> an illegal act.
>
> Now, a PERSON can be guilty or innocent. Specifically, they are guilty
> or innocent of an ACTION. In this sort of discussion, and specifically
> with the usage of the phrase you have mentioned, the action is an
> illegal action. In fact, courts (in the U.S., since you made that
> distinction) go out of their way to avoid touching the question of an
> action's defined legality or illegality.
>
> If you don't understand (and I guess Jay doesn't, else he wouldn't have
> posted what he did)
> Taking some random child is kidnap, and is illegal. Forcing that child
> to have sex with you is illegal. Killing the child afterwards is
> illegal. Those actions are all defined as illegal.
>
> Now...
> Did Glenn Beck rape and kill a young girl in 1990?
> The answer is, even if he did, he is INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY.
>
> It's really simple to understand. To understand if an act is legal or
> illegal, you need nothing more than the ability to read, and access to
> the laws. To determine if a person is guilty or innocent, you need a
> court case, and lawyers and judges and so on.
>
> Of course, I can't blame Jay for not knowing the basic difference
> between actions and people, because i think he (proudly[1]) dropped out
> of high school before taking the class that explained this basic fact.
>
>>
>> On Nov 28, 2010 4:38 PM, "lilo" <al3lilo at autistici.org
>> <mailto:al3lilo at autistici.org>> wrote:
>> http://wlcentral.org/
>>
>>
>> whats about legal or not legal?
>>
>>
>> l.
>>
>>
> ____________________________________________________
> Pirate Parties International - General Talk
> pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net
>> <mailto:pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net>
> http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general
>
>> ____________________________________________________
>> Pirate Parties International - General Talk
>> pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net
>> http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general
>
> [1] Second paragraph of 'background' section -
> http://www.pp-international.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=25802
>
> - --
> Andrew Norton
> http://ktetch.blogspot.com
> Tel: (352)6-KTETCH [352-658-3824]
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>
> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJM8z29AAoJECjjuYTW3X5HgyEIAO8q0s+19tLN68DCLxO5JmWj
> yMxC3NvQvq+haw0eNc5wkxftVVU2lGVyT9loGqDVEod9wZf+YI5EJXCE4B/1eJVb
> eYFW9KRJecswmK83PdGLZ6xWzp6SCQnBPAGmGezpTs0d0OZAjMYBDuNHaqxflKKT
> +bGwKg6zBOgK5jF7MpMgxX3rd2lC00FRoXj07W4Bku5ecxHC8jnrlBMQeRURWifd
> e6B1XcpSWCM+mCGkJazvCz6HurLkIhdG0/IePxX6h2rIoDkiSX2XvtR60FB75r71
> X6IFLZGZhjeg29WUwaaTcIrFHUVC1FOl/Xvgkw+wiNhmtlel8mdihy0xafzjfTk=
> =TM0E
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> ____________________________________________________
> Pirate Parties International - General Talk
> pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net
> http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.pirateweb.net/pipermail/pp.international.general/attachments/20101129/17955763/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the pp.international.general mailing list