[pp.int.general] Are there "good" and "wrong" Rigths?

[Francisco George]

I Personally don't think we do challenge the article about IPR in the
declaration of HR. I think we should recognize the artist/creators/authors
rights to live from their work. I dont think there should be a problem with
that, as long the time is shorter(but HR doesn't fix a time for that, those
are locals laws that fix 70 years or more). What we challange is the right
from Vampires and CopyRight Sharks that benefits of CR when they "bought"
the original IPR to the artist/creator/author and those are the ones that
really benefits from the 70 or longer protection times and not the
artist/author/creator.

Mostly those purchase contracts really doesn't benefits them, except for
some big names, but to what extends usually those contracts are TOP SECRET,
with very strong NDA in benefits of the purchaser. Just take as example
George Michael and Prince both of them denounced or cancelled their
contracts. And those Vampires/Sharks have done what ever possible to bury
them and erase them out of our memory.

So yes I think we can agree to the article protecting the "IPR" rights in
HR as long as they protect the real creator/artist/author. Fighting to
shorten the protection times(70 years or more are clearly abusive) has
nothing to do with HR but only with Local or International laws.

2012/3/29 <pp.international.general-request at lists.pirateweb.net>

> Are there "good" and "wrong" Rigths?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.pirateweb.net/pipermail/pp.international.general/attachments/20120329/f031ba06/attachment.html>