[pp.int.general] Basic income - how does that fit into the pirate ideology?

Thrasos Nerantzis thrasos at gnosysoft.com
Fri Jul 12 19:05:17 CEST 2013


It's  a core issue, especially for the countries of southern europe.

I think the minimum basic income is important, especially in industrialized countries where bosses tend to come together on agreements, so that they can bring down salaries and increase margins.

I don't think we should be debating the minimum basic salary, because by definition it's there to defend the lower classes of labour,
 instead we should be introducing a "maximum income", to avoid repeating what we've all witnessed with the banking sector.

Perhaps a "maximum income" along with decision transparency might help reduce the chances of wealth over-accumulation and poverty.

Whats your take on this?

--
Thrasos Nerantzis
www.thrasos.net






On Jul 12, 2013, at 7:46 PM, Tom Behets <behets at gmail.com> wrote:

> Some days ago, a non pirate told me her idea of the Pirate party.
> She said pirate party is constantly co-opted by all sorts of leftist interest groups to push their agenda.
> I feel the same.
> 
> We should stick to our core issues. 
> If you aim for everything, you get nothing...
> 
> Tom
> 
> On 12 Jul 2013 15:26, "Zbigniew Łukasiak" <zzbbyy at gmail.com> wrote:
> Basic income is often mentioned as point of the pirates program.  Do
> you think it is a universal thing across all pirate parties - or is it
> just the German pirates that stand strongly behind it?
> 
> Do you think it is leftist?
> 
> Personally I support Basic Income.  It might be viewed as slightly
> leftist - but if it is introduced together with a linear taxation
> scale and getting rid of unemployment benefits - then it is not
> leftist at all.  For me the most important aspect of this whole
> package is that it makes governance simpler.  Taxation is decoupled
> and can be payed independently for all income sources and the state is
> not forced to do things that depend too much on personal circumstances
> (like checking if the person is really unemployed and if he really
> tries to find a job etc) - state is not good in these - people quickly
> learn how to fool it and that is demoralizing.  But state is good for
> universal services - like paying everyone the same amount.  So let the
> state do what it is good at and let other, smaller organizations do
> other things.
> 
> There are of course many other benefits as well - but this is what
> moves me personally.
> 
> --
> Zbigniew Lukasiak
> http://brudnopis.blogspot.com/
> http://perlalchemy.blogspot.com/
> ____________________________________________________
> Pirate Parties International - General Talk
> pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net
> http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general
> ____________________________________________________
> Pirate Parties International - General Talk
> pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net
> http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.pirateweb.net/pipermail/pp.international.general/attachments/20130712/0ff6dcf4/attachment.html>


More information about the pp.international.general mailing list